Constitutions Are Not All Created Equal

I love history because it can teach us so much about what we are going through today.  It can also be our guide to the truth.  Take our Constitution as an example. During each and every election year, we will hear the words of how certain politicians support our Constitution but it is only words.  If you follow their actions you will quickly discover, their true beliefs, are not even close to what the document actually stands for.  

Since 1789, our Constitution has been amended twenty-seven times but the original drafted document has remained untouched throughout our history.   Isn’t it amazing that even with a steady flow of ever-changing leadership, the original document continues to stand the test of time and the Republic continues to be the example that other countries aspire to emulate?

The most recent attempt to follow our lead was the country of Brazil, in 1988.  They drafted and passed the Federal Constitution of 1988.  This document was meant to structure a democracy from their long-standing military rule.  The country’s economy improved and quickly became the envy of the southern hemisphere.  The citizens of Brazil were thriving even better than they ever thought possible.  Oh…but there is always a price and it became obvious in short order what that price was.  They assumed that the government could be the ever-generous provider.

The Brazilian Constitution is 77,000 words long and is literally packed with social, economic and political mandates.  It goes so far as to dictate a forty-four-hour work week for all businesses and mandatory retirement ages; 65 years of age for men and 60 for women.  Since the passage of this Constitution, the federal spending has nearly doubled.  Inflation has slowly but continuously crept up mainly because the document stipulates that the purchasing power of their federal benefits (health care and pensions) shall forever be preserved.  In other words, the legal document that should have provided the citizens lasting freedom and prosperity is choking the life out of the very system they have come to depend on; primarily due to too much government reliance.   

Now let’s contrast their document to ours.  Our Constitution is only 4,400 words and that is after two hundred and thirty-one years of existence and twenty-seven revisions.  Already we can see that less is more.  In addition, our Constitution does not mandate or call for the enforcement of economic demands.  As a matter of fact, it pushes those social, economic and political pressures into local and state governments so that those nearest to the issue can solve the problems.  As to model the national document, each State has their own constitution which allows for an interesting addition found in all 50 state constitutions; the mention of a divine power.  The U.S. Constitution never explicitly mentions God, but the same cannot be said of the 50 state constitutions.  In fact, God or the divine is mentioned at least once in each state constitution and nearly 200 times overall, according to a Pew Research Center analysis.  We are indeed, “One Nation Under God!”

Quoting our Founding Fathers in the opening words of this great document, “We the People” make the difference and we the people have the power to control our government not the other way around.  Our early leaders were not lifelong politicians, they were hardworking men of high moral character who understood that the government didn’t exist to benefit anyone; only a foundation to rest each society upon.  These brave pioneers did not agree on everything, they did not all like one another and some of them were uneducated; making bad decisions.  But they all had one thing in common, as should the citizens of today, being of one mind; the belief that we are creating a Country that allows for every citizen to have Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness.  

What adds to today’s confusion is that for a Country founded on Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness; each political party no longer demonstrates these three rights in all that they do. I find it extremely odd that certain parties support the death of the innocent, unwanted and unborn solely on the auspices of purging a past mistake of the parents.  These same parties also rebuke the monuments of our ancestors, in the hope of wiping away their mistake as well.  Both actions testify to the selfishness of the parties and their reproach to the rights we should unitedly hold dear. As our Constitution illustrates, through the lack of an abundance of words; it is not the words the people say that hold them guilty but the actions they take.

May God continue to bless these United States of America!    

If this is my last post, I want all to know there was only one purpose for all that I have written; to have made a positive difference in the lives of others. 

Anthony “Tony” Boquet, the author of “The Bloodline of Wisdom, The Awakening of a Modern Solutionary”

The Death of America’s Common Sense

We are gathered here today to remember an old and faithful servant of the people of the United States of America.  For years people have been saying “Common Sense is not very common anymore.” but I am not sure if everyone fully realizes how true that statement really is.  

Common Sense has been with America since its founding.  Most, if not all, of the drafters of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution of the United States signed these documents only after the words had the approval of Common Sense.  For centuries Common Sense was the voice of the people.  Leaders from all walks of life understood that for this Country to grow, prosper and last; it would require the unifying power of Common Sense. 

Today, the number of community heads, government officials and even church organizers (in honor of Common Sense, I refrain from calling them leaders) have chosen to shun this leader’s friend in numbers never before seen.  Not because of anything Common Sense has done, but instead as a way to distance the citizens from what Common Sense stands for.  The recent decline in Common Sense’s health can be attributed to the introduction of a third gender, the moral decline evident in public programming, crazy ideas “made true” on social media such as the defunding of our local police and most recently the idea that looting and rioting against innocent people is a citizen’s right if they are angry enough. 

The facts are that the endurance of Common Sense is no longer possible with the mindset of the vast majority of this country.  People no longer want to be inconvenienced by the truth spoken by Common Sense.  We have too many people with varying agendas, biases and beliefs who no longer wish to come together under a single value system provided by Common Sense.  Suffering a senseless death by neglect because too many people rely on their own shaded “truths” with no willingness to even consider bringing Common Sense to the table.

For those citizens who have shared a relationship with Common Sense and has been caring for Common Sense through the years, we have analyzed the various forms of human communication and observed the public interaction only to admit that the time has come for us to formally declare; Common Sense is officially dead in the United States of America.   

With the death of this “truthful servant”, this Country is literally at an intersection of crossroads; we will either take the path that divide us further as a Nation or we will, together, journey down the road that brings us back to unity and the birth of a new herald of truth.

I pray that this idolization of off the wall views has not endured for so long that our reversal back toward our historic single national value is still possible.  Once more our thoughts, words and deeds as a Country; must each loudly proclaim our common shared belief that we are still, “One Nation under God”.

If this is my last post, I want all to know there was only one purpose for all that I have written; to have made a positive difference in the lives of others.

Anthony “Tony” Boquet, the author of “The Bloodline of Wisdom, The Awakening of a Modern Solutionary”

Societal Restrictions Never Change the Truths

In today’s workforce, a high percentage of people have been forced to work from home or not work at all.  At the same time our elementary schools and day care facilities are closed creating a more demanding situation for those workers with young children.  Six months ago, we would have never thought this work-from-home model’s success possible.  Still, many companies have been able to maintain a close to normal revenue stream with little if any terminations of staff due to productivity issues. A few of these companies are now considering maintaining this work structure into the future.  Without a doubt, some companies will conceive that this “new normal” as better than before and it might be for some workers.  What the company leaders might not be considering is that without the society-imposed restrictions, this company-wide model would not have been considered and for good reasons. 

As individuals, our society has always affected us; just without us realizing it.  Even the ultra-successful among us believe that their limits are solely personal but they really are not.  This has never been more evident than today.  Without a doubt, when it comes to temporary change due to outside forces, the American people will always believe that the sky is the limit.  We have a remarkable “can do spirit”.  At least, as long as everyone has to operate under the same parameters.  We are an adapting people but temporarily acclimating our professional life to societal restraints imposed upon everyone may not be a good long-term business model.  Especially, when it comes to the need for balancing all three of our personas; our professional, personal and spiritual lives.  We have to take into consideration that all decisions have consequences; some of which do not show up until years later.  As a society, any “new normal” must positively affect all three areas of human life and do so for a lifetime.  Behavioral science clearly teaches us that behavioral change manifested from being forced to do anything, is not the same as changes occurring from a personal choice.  This three to six month “behavioral change experiment” being caused by the pandemic will not provide adequate data to warrant replacing centuries of workplace design and management.  It will however, reveal more possibilities for integrated changes into the future.   

In order for long-term positive change to be predicted the study would depend heavily on the value of the truths.  A caveat to any short-term problem is that the truth can be difficult to discern.  In an effort to weed out the falsehoods in the solution process, one only needs to turn to history and the ever-present Natural Laws of our planet.  Natural laws are the eternal truths not effected by temporary abnormalities.  They never change so they are always dependable.  They never lie so they can always be relied upon in every situation.  We have already covered one, our three personas.

Under the most routine of conditions, when confronting challenging issues; humans naturally try to make positive changes in their life.  Even when doing so, when our normal practices are interrupted by an unforeseen event, we all struggle with change because we are creatures of habit.  This is no different for business leaders or the rank and file.  Our routines take hold of our life because of another natural law; The Law of Action.  This law says that we only do things for three reasons; to increase pleasure, avoid pain or for the love of another. This truth controls every decision we make.  Whenever we find an area in our life that needs to be changed the Law of Action automatically comes into play as well.  We used this law to form our previous habits so we have to use this same law to form the new and, in this case, required changes.  When this disruption moves on and our life rhythms return, some of the less disciplined people will begin to fail in a work from home environment.  Not because they are bad people but because they need the structure of direct supervision to guide their actions.  People can be forced to do anything for short periods of time but given increased choices the above law will guide their decisions.  This shutdown worked because society used the law; the love for our neighbors as the compelling reason.  The law worked the way it always does.  Think of this law as the “why” behind the “what” I want to change.

There is another law whose power cannot be reduced or ignored when changes want to be made permanent.  The Law of Positive Change creates the blueprint for successful change.  This truth lays out three requirements needed to affect any changes we seek.  First, we must have a burning desire to act.  A burning desire to change; to reach the pleasure, avoid the pain or the need to protect the ones we love.  Second, the willingness to apply daily effort.  Again, as during this pandemic, no choices are given and for a short period of time, the effort required can work but once options return, other pleasures will compete for the efforts required to change.  All change requires constant repetitious actions which will become the foundation of the new habit.  When people have an abundance of choice, we can easily be drawn off track; thus, the need for close supervision.  Many people need that high touch supervision to function at their peak performance.  And third, we must be patient and allow time for the habits to take hold.  Good leaders recognize, that prior to this forced workflow model, close supervision was required for some people and that for others it can be a hinderance.  Today, this is not happening and people are not being terminated because supervisors understand we are forcing them to operate differently.  In the current short-term environment this is acceptable but it cannot continue long-term. This law is the “how” behind the “why” people are able to change.

Finally, we must contend with another law; The Law of the Stages of Time. There are only three stages of time; Past, Present and Future.  No more, no less.  Understanding where we are makes a difference in the use of the prior laws.  The requirements of the Law of Positive Change unite with the Stages of Time. 

Requirements of Positive Change                                          Stages of Time                       

A Burning Desire                                                                   Future

Daily Effort                                                                            Present

Passage of Time                                                                      Past

Even with the support and guidance of the natural laws, we still will struggle to make positive changes in our lives but with these laws, change is always possible.  Without them, change is impossible.  Both scenarios depend heavily on the power that choices bring to the table.  If any company tries to use this temporary choice-less situation as the basis for a new model of workforce design, they will have to deal with the negative outcomes these laws will present to them.  For those of us who understands these truths, the return to a successful normal will be quick and painless.  In addition, the lessons we learn through this tumultuous experience can be applied to all future change.     

Anthony “Tony” Boquet, the author of “The Bloodline of Wisdom, The Awakening of a Modern Solutionary”

If this is my last post, I want all to know there was only one purpose for all that I have written; to have made a positive difference in the lives of others.

Shouldn’t Higher Education Lead to Wisdom?

There are three sources of knowledge for a reason.

  • Knowledge applied without education leaves you foolish.
  • Knowledge applied without experience leaves you naive.
  • Knowledge applied without ethics / morals leaves you gullible.

It is only when we selflessly apply all three sources that we can be assured of a wise decision.

Anthony “Tony” Boquet

The sole purpose of every business ever created has been based on one central premise; to offer a product or service at a profit for a reasonable price that will solve a problem that the consumer could not solve on their own.  The same should be said for our colleges and universities when it comes to their ability to transfer the knowledge needed to solve future problems in the specific field of education.  Wisdom is the application of the three sources of knowledge toward the best solution to a problem.  It is up to the schools to affirm that their education is first true so that it can be transferred as knowledge applied as wisdom.  

 After all, wouldn’t a school be the perfect place to explore, understand and apply the truths that answer the questions raised by the unknowing?

The early universities were established around the understanding that knowledge is made up of three sources of development; Education, Experience and Ethical / Moral values.  The Solutionaries who led these great institutions understood that wise decisions cannot be assured without all three being applied as a solution to a problem.  For years institutions of higher learning were solely and totally focused on providing all three areas of development.  This required that the school hire professors who were well educated but also had to have experience in their field of study and be able to demonstrate a strong commitment to ethical and moral values.  In other words, professors were not only “educators” but experienced ethical practitioners.  Sadly, in todays hallowed halls of academia, this is not always the case.  Most schools are satisfied with turning out students who have an education instead of being Solutionaries with the knowledge required to make wise decisions.      

We live in a circular world.  This means that what goes around comes around.  In other words, if you experience something in your business of choice, you will more than likely experience it again in the future and you should be better equipped to handle the problem the second time around.  You will also have lived through the ethical / moral consequences of the decisions you chose to make.  That cannot be done solely by studying simulations, no matter how well established or delivered.  Some consequences may not surface until months or years after the decision is made.  A professor who never actually experienced this phenomenon has no way of teaching the lessons that only experiences can uncover.  

Every wise decision you or your business associates make must be based on the truth; identifying the true problem, understanding the true motivating factors impacting those affected by the problem and committing to the truly selfless solution as well as the consequences that will impact each of the three parties involved.  Education alone will fall short because it is almost impossible to do without experience yet some academic leaders believe that wise decision making is not important, not their responsibility or that education alone is adequate to deliver a solid graduate. 

My personal experiences taught me that each source of knowledge does matter; as a practitioner, as a business leader and now as someone who in works in academia.  I am proud to say that the institution I work for still delivers on all three components of wisdom.  Our professors are well educated and came out of the profession of which they now teach, each course we teach has an ethics component built into it and the educational material taught is based on well established truths. In addition, we have an experience requirement tied to the use of our college level designations.     

Regardless what is believed, the fact does not change; experience along with education and ethics are the three factors required in order to make wise decisions.  Sure, anyone can luck out and make a wise decision without any of the three but tuitions are paid and the value associated with holding a degree of higher learning demands more than just luck.  The business that hire the graduates do so because of the perceived value.  They do not just want to survive, they want to thrive, and that takes more than just luck.  If given a choice between two highly educated candidates; one with the knowledge to solve problems verses the other just a well-educated student, the corporate leaders would likely select wisdom over education every time.  One can buy an education but wisdom is only obtained through a lifetime of selfless dedication to solving problems with the truth.  

If this is my last post, I want all to know there was only one purpose for all that I have written; to have made a positive difference in the lives of others.

Anthony “Tony” Boquet, the author of “The Bloodline of Wisdom, The Awakening of a Modern Solutionary”, Vice President, Business Development at The American College of Financial Services

Three Crosses on a Hill

It is a chilly afternoon in early April.  The wind is briskly blowing over the rocky hillside.  A small squad of soldiers, having just completed their assigned tasks, huddle around a small fire to rest. The gruesome duties which they fulfilled, though cruel in the eyes of many, are just routine actions for this experienced team of men.  Even as their three prisoners moan and scream in agony and the bystanders gather to jeer or cry all around them; the soldiers can casually joke and enjoy the company of one another because this is just like every other day in their everyday lives.

As for the three men that they had just nailed and suspended onto three blood stained crosses, the day was anything but routine.  It was a day unlike any other.  A single day filled with so much unimaginable pain and humiliation that it seemed to last for an eternity.  Only to culminate into  one final massive physical trauma of being impaled onto a wooden beam, lifted and secured to another in the shape of a cross displayed in a public place so that each man was forced to suffer mental anguish as well.  They were left to their own mental torture as to ponder their unique existence while excruciatingly balancing their spiritual future on the remainder of the last day of their earthly existence.   

One of them was not satisfied to suffer alone.  He joined in the torment of one the three.

One of the criminals who were hanged there was hurling abuse at Him, saying,

“Are You not the Christ? Save Yourself and us!”

But the other answered, and rebuking him saying,

“Do you not even fear God, since you are under the same sentence of condemnation? We indeed are suffering justly, for we are receiving what we deserve for our deeds; but this man has done nothing wrong.”

“Jesus, remember me when You come in Your kingdom!”

Jesus said to him, “Truly I say to you, today you shall be with Me in Paradise.”

This passage fully describes the life embodiment of the three solutions to every problem.  The criminal who taunted Jesus represents those of us who intentionally make the wrong choices.  Jesus, on the other hand, validates the exact opposite by setting the example that it is always possible to make the right choices in life.  And finally, the repentant thief, is the person who goes through life choosing the acceptable concessions.

Criminal one, is portrayed as some one who lacks empathy and has no fear of retribution; even as he suffers the ultimate penalty for utter selfishness.  It is clear that he and the other criminal were partners in crime.  They were caught stealing, likely from the Roman government or from a high-ranking Roman official, evidenced by their death sentence.  Theft from a regular citizen would have resulted in the loss of a hand not the loss of life.  This case is what became known as a Capital Crime. 

As we analyze the comments that the second criminal makes to his buddy, we can assume that he lived a life filled with regret from the decisions he made.  He was likely someone who would be referred to as a follower.  He knew the decisions he made were wrong but he did them anyway and probably without total commitment to his actions.  If left to his own accord in the decision-making process, he would spend a little more time in deciding his actions, weighing the right choice from the wrong and would probably land on the choice of an acceptable concession; always closer to the wrong choice.  In other words, he probably was a good man who followed the wrong people.

The example of Jesus, from a Christian’s perspective, is clearly a man who made the right choices and was willing to endure the consequences of his decision.  If you believe that he was true man, then he experiences hurt, suffering and pain like all of us.  If you also believe He is true God, then you believe He could have avoided all this pain just by willing it so.  This is what make the story of Good Friday so remarkable. 

The story of an innocent man standing for the truth even when that single decision will get him killed.  For three years, the Jewish leaders squabbled over the truths Jesus was sharing with their followers. Many of them secretly believed these truths but their livelihoods and social status required that they rebuke the truth.  It was their selfish reasons that ultimately cost him his life.  When he was directly asked if he was the Son of God, he told the court the complete truth.  “I am!”  These two words were told to Moses two thousand years before; when kneeling in the presence of God asked, “What should I call you? God replied, “I am who I am.”  In three days, their selfish lies would be exposed to the world.  

Anthony “Tony” Boquet, the author of “The Bloodline of Wisdom, The Awakening of a Modern Solutionary”

If this is my last post, I want all to know there was only one purpose for all that I have written; to have made a positive difference in the lives of others.

The Annunciation; the Feast of Free Will

If you are a Christian of any denomination, the ancestors of your faith followed the belief that a virgin girl of twelve to thirteen years of age, was asked by an angel if she would allow herself to become the mother of the son of God.  A pretty hefty ask of anyone; much less from someone who would be considered a child today but two thousand years ago she would have been viewed as a woman, since she reached what was considered then the age of reason; twelve years of age.

Today Christians worldwide celebrate that special day because her miraculous offspring, by historical accounts, ended up changing the path of mankind forever.  From a solely human perspective, this single decision laid the first stone for man’s relationship to family tree of God.  Without Mary’s consent, Jesus would have not been born and countless prophecies would never have been fulfilled.  That single, yes answer was unquestionably the single most impactful answer ever given by any one person in all of history.  

Think about the ramifications of your person decisions. 

When you make big decisions, do you spend time procrastinating? 

If you make a mistake; you say no when you should have said yes.  Do the negative outcomes haunt you? 

Mary was just a poor girl who lived a righteous life.  She was faithful and tried to live a life reflective of her Jewish beliefs but that can be said us many people, then or today.  What sets her apart from others was the depth of her faith and the belief that by doing God’s will everything would be fine.  

From God’s perspective, He shows us that we are not forced to do anything.  Mary could have said no to the angel.  At the time, she was engaged to be married; she was planning her life, minding her own business.  You could say that God shared His will with her and she accepted His path over her own. 

Do we have enough faith to do that? 

God nudges us many times in our life, showing us the direction that He wants us to go, but we don’t always accept His nudge.  We have our own plans. 

What miracles could we be apart of, if we followed Mary’s example?  

We all have free will, and God respects it completely…He understands; created us to use it.

The rest of this article is compliments of the website, http://www.churchyear.net/.  If you enjoy history, check this out.  

The Feast of the Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary dates back to at least the 6th century, and is mentioned between AD 530 and 533 in a sermon by Abraham of Ephesus.  It was adopted worldwide through the Trullan Synod (AD 692) that speaks of the Annunciation feast as universally celebrated in the Catholic Church.  

The oldest observance of the day is on March 25, although in Spain the feast was at times celebrated on December 19 to avoid any chance of the date falling during the Lenten season. March 25 is obviously 9 months before Christmas, the birth of Jesus. Scholars are not completely sure whether the date of the Annunciation influenced the date of Christmas, or vice-versa. Before the Church adopted fixed days of celebration, early Christians speculated on the dates of major events in Jesus’ life. Second-century Latin Christians in Rome and North Africa tried to find the day in which Jesus died. By the time of Tertullian (d. AD 225) they had concluded that he died on Friday, March 25, AD 29 (incidentally, this is an impossibility, since March 25 in the year AD 29 was not a Friday). How does the day of Jesus’ death relate to the day of his conception? It comes from the Jewish concept of the “integral age” of the great Jewish prophets. This is the notion that the prophets of Israel died on the same dates as their birth or conception. Therefore, if Jesus died on March 25, he was also conceived that day. The pseudo-(John)Chrysostomic work de solstitia et aequinoctia conceptionis et nativitatis nostri Iesu Christi et Iohannis Baptistae accepts the same calculation. St. Augustine mentions it as well. Other ancient Christians believed Jesus was conceived on March 25th for another reason: they believed (based on Jewish calculations of the period) that the creation of the world occurred that day. Thus, it was fitting that the one who makes us new creations was conceived on the day the world was created.

Anthony “Tony” Boquet, the author of “The Bloodline of Wisdom, The Awakening of a Modern Solutionary”

If this is my last post, I want all to know there was only one purpose for all that I have written; to have made a positive difference in the lives of others.

Where Two or More are Gathered in My Name

Deciding on the best solution is not always easy and sometimes even comes through conflict. With the Corona virus bringing chaos to many aspects of our personal, professional and spiritual lives, we must rely on the wisdom of uniquely qualified Solutionaries to solve the problems that this confusion breeds. Parents must make decision for their families, business owners and company leaders are charged with set rules for our professional life and each of these must rely on the medical Solutionaries for trustworthy information needed to make the wise decisions.   Every one of these decision makers must recognize, that in order to make truly wise choices, they must turn to their God for the spiritual aspects of the problem that man-kind cannot control.  While this pandemic touches the lives of everyone, conflicts within our own families will be an additional problem that must be addressed.

Two thousand years ago, a man named Jesus, taught us about conflict resolution guidelines. These guidelines give us the road-map of the best route to take when we need to correct our brothers and sisters who are on the wrong side of a problem.  He used the Power of the Wisdom of Three to teach us this simple process.  As you will soon read, the problems we deal with haven’t changed in over two thousand years and neither has the solution process but be aware, two of the three methods only work if the person believes that you care about them, they can trust you and you know the true solution.

Jesus said to his disciples:
15 “If your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he listens to you, you have won over your brother.
16 If he does not listen, take one or two others along with you, so that every fact may be established on the testimony of two or three witnesses.
17 If he refuses to listen to them, tell the Church. If he refuses to listen even to the Church, then treat him as you would a Gentile or a tax collector.
20 For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.”

Matthew 18:15-20

In His discourse to His follower, He said, “When you see that your brother has done something wrong, first approach the person alone.”  This one-on-one technique is very effective for many reasons.  The key being we never like being told we are wrong and when confronted in a public setting, emotions and embarrassment can last for years.  Also the person may have not been aware of the mistake in the first place.  

Jesus goes on to say, “When you are unable to resolve the problem alone, seek the help of another friend or two.”  We have all heard and likely said that two minds are better than one. Whenever we work on a problem, by bringing in a Solutionary or two with more education and or experience and a strong moral character; the problem will be easier to solve.  The person who was wrong in their thought process will be more likely to agree once they are convinced by the facts agreed upon by people respected and trusted.  Jesus, also being the Son of God, understood our problems must be resolved using all three personas which includes our spiritual nature.  He tells us that “When two or three are gathered together in His Name, He will be in their midst” to give additional support.  He knows that we to have faith that our problems are His problems too.  When we ask Him to help us, He says He will.

When both of these methods fail, a last ditched effort should be used.  Jesus, puts forth the reality that there is only one God and one Church and we are all part of that same church.  Once revealed to our Church family the problem is now a societal problem; much like where we are our efforts against the problems resulting from our handling of the pandemic.  If the combination of love, prayers and trusted advice from the entire societal family doesn’t do the trick, then our conscience can be clear that we did all we could to make a difference toward the true solution.  The problem and the consequences are solely his’ or her’s to solve and deal with from that point on.   

If this is my last post, I want all to know there was only one purpose for all that I have written; to have made a positive difference in the lives of others.

Anthony “Tony” Boquet, the author of “The Bloodline of Wisdom, The Awakening of a Modern Solutionary”

Nesting; Together Life

SONY DSC

It can be said, that our families form us in many ways.  As children we depend on our parents or guardians to provide safety, shelter and comfort.  These first teachers are charged with the responsibility of preparing us for when we are no longer dependent upon someone else.  This home environment and the lessons learned there will develop our personal, professional and spiritual personas; the basis of who we are and who we become in society.  This is how important the nest we create is to all of man-kind.     

Many animals depend on and instinctively build nests.  The human animal does as well.  We might not like to think of ourselves as animals but the truth remains.  Human nesting is commonly called our home.  Some of us nest for years in the same place while some practice a nomadic lifestyle.  Those viewed as nomads, still create a nest wherever they stop, even if it is only for the night.  When we study these nesting animals, we find only three reasons they share in this practice; safety, shelter and comfort.

What I find most interesting about nesting is that it is biological, ecological and sociological.  Our home is where we raise our children which is a biological process.  It is ecological as it relates to the environments we create and the relationships between the living things in our lives.  Unlike other animals, our home is also the center of our social circle making the act of nesting sociological in nature.   

Biology, ecology and sociology all encompass human health and the environment’s effect on how we live.  Health takes into consideration our mental, physical and spiritual well being. A number of characteristics of a healthy environment is controlled by the family.  During the Coronavirus pandemic it became clear that our home, country and the entire world became a very small yet connected place.  We are all in this together!

Unless you studied ecology, I am not sure how many of you know about the Law of Symbiosis.  It is a very interesting law that happens all around us every day of our life.  The word symbiosis actually means “together life”.  The law refers to the three types of relationships organisms share that live in close approximation to one another; often one cannot live without the other.  In extreme cases, one organism actually lives inside the other organism.  This law is the basis of ecology; the study of living organisms and their environment and as you can tell, it is uniquely Powered by the Wisdom of Three.  The relationships are:

  • Parasitism: the parasite benefits and the host are harmed.
  • Commensalism: one species benefit, the other is neither hurt nor helped.
  • Mutualism: when both species benefit.

During the time of being sequestered at home due to the pandemic; in a family environment we see all three of these “isms” as an evolution from one to another. From a leadership perspective, let’s examine each separately as they pertain to a parent’s relationship to the children; especially during times of reflection.

Parasitism is often viewed as a negative way to live life because of the harm the parasite brings to the host organism.  Many times in life the host organism knows the parasite is harming them but graciously allows the relationship to continue.  I can site hundreds of cases where a parent selflessly gave their all for the children.  When the children are young this is totally understandable and a very natural occurrence. It is only when the child becomes older and knowingly “feeds” off the parent’s generosity does this affiliation become a negative situation.  

As the child matures into adolescence the relationship should become one of Commensalism.  The child should benefit from the parental support and developmental guidance while the parent is made whole through the results of these efforts.  From their perspective, the father and mother are enriched to be able to be a part of the fulfillment of their child’s needs and the rewards are great on many levels while the detriment can and should be minimal.

Once the child has matured into an adult, the relationship should have reached a healthy state of Mutualism.  The child and the parents both benefit from each other’s existence without harm to either.  It is here that the parents can observe the start of a new cycle of relationships and the continuation of their legacy.  The child takes the lessons learned in their childhood family life, apply them in their own adult life while also passing them along to the next generation.  The one time “parasite” now becomes a host to their own children; allowing the cycle of life to continue and thrive.

Science continues to prove the Power of the Wisdom of Three.  Through this Wisdom of Three, we find the blueprint that we need to solve our family problems, even during trying times.  The term symbiosis, together life, is the explanation of the steps that a Solutionary should take in order to teach others the problem-solving truths of family life. 

For everyone who selflessly leads another along their life’s journey, shout out the motto; Together Life.                 

If this is my last post, I want all to know there was only one purpose for all that I have written; to have made a positive difference in the lives of others.

Anthony “Tony” Boquet, the author of “The Bloodline of Wisdom, The Awakening of a Modern Solutionary”

Three States of Formative Change

Decide to make the jump!

We all go through changes in our lives.  Some of these changes are subtle, so subtle that we don’t even notice them our self.  The funny thing is that when we do notice the change sometimes, we find we had no control over it. We changed but not because of anything of our own doing.  This type of change is usually not lasting or sustainable.     

Whether controlled or uncontrolled, people do change and when they intentionally change for the betterment of others as well as themselves it is usually permanent.  This is the type of change that can elevate us into the three various states of formative change.  Thanks to the Power of the Wisdom of Three we can easily remember, understand and teach these to the people who mean the most to us.  As a leader of people, you can only foster change in others; you can never change them yourself. 

The first state we go through is Transformation.  By definition, we slowly change in composition or structure; slowly changing our outward appearance.  This sort of change can be considered natural, occurring as part of normal growth or it can be controlled with our help.  With the latter, we might spend numerous hours in a gym to get in better shape, read countless books to become smarter or increase our attention to the three areas of stewardship in order to improve your spiritual nature.  Any of these are noticeable and beneficial.

Once we have been transformed, we can “choose” to proceed to a state of Transfiguration.  The big differentiator between someone being transformed verses being transfigured is that you literally change right before the eyes of the people you deal with.  When we are transfigured, everyone can and does take notice.  You stand out from the crowd in a very positive way but usually for short periods of time.  To be transfigured means that those who know us best might not recognize our changed thoughts, words or action as they pertain to our routine self but they can readily attest to the changes they see.  These transfigured people are just average people who, out of nowhere, say what needs to be said or do remarkable deeds when they need to happen.  This stage of change requires a selfless loving heart so as to push away the normal fear that accompanies all change.      

The third state usually has the most radical and lasting change because it deals with totality of our physical, mental and spiritual self; it is Transubstantiation.  This is when our body, mind and soul are observed as a united being while at the same time our thoughts, words and deeds belong to the spiritual essence of our Creator.  We can all accept that we are human but that is not good enough; we are called to transcend into being the best human we can be.  To make this change requires the aid and grace of our Creator; we cannot do this alone.  Transubstantiation can only occur when our body, mind and soul are unified at the highest level possible.  People will perceive us a normal person doing holy actions created through loving thoughts, words and deeds.  When a person is one with the Creator, they are transubstantiated with Him.

“He lives in them and they in Him.”          

Anthony “Tony” Boquet, the author of “The Bloodline of Wisdom, The Awakening of a Modern Solutionary” If this is my last post, I want all to know there was only one purpose for all that I have written; to have made a positive difference in the lives of others.

The Happiness of the Pursuit

There is a natural comfort in the ancient truths when modern words fall short. 

Our Forefathers instilled in America’s Declaration of Independence three important rights, unalienable rights to be protected by our government; Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of happiness.  In other words, our government should pass laws, use taxes and build armies only to the extent of them protecting life, allowing our liberty and to advance all people’s pursuit of happiness. 

Are these inalienable rights still the focus of our political fiduciaries? 

This question is very valid since many civic groups no longer believe that life is precious nor that it deserves to be protected.  These groups skirt the true right by creating interesting names to alternate “rights”; reproductive rights or pro-choice.  Our Founding Fathers never imagined their country’s government would intentionally support abortion or euthanasia yet many today would gladly vote to abolish the true right to life in return for the support of their fake concern for welfare of others.

What protections did they imagine would flow from the right to Liberty?

The right of liberty was added so as to ingrain the need for personal choice and the support of the human condition of free will.  These pioneers of forward thinkers had just left a very oppressive environment in England.  They did not want the new government to infringe in their religious beliefs or their personal decisions when it came to the protection of their family.  Liberty also encompassed the power to select their future political representatives fairly in a republic format.  No longer would they be tied to one leader for life; they envisioned a Country led by one of their own, an ever-changing servant leader.    

Do Americans still believe they have the right to pursue happiness? 

This is a tough question to answer not because the other two are less important but because, I believe, that this one is the most misunderstood of the three.  I also agree with Rob Oliver who said, “the only way for us to successfully get the pursuit of happiness is to seek and find the happiness of the pursuit.”  When we no longer find happiness in the pursuit, “of the truth” we naturally lose the desire for the happiness we were all created to seek. 

This gets to the heart of the three rights borne of truth.  The Founding Fathers would have never agreed to a government that allowed people autonomous freedoms based solely on happiness.  Just because a person may find happiness in their ability to kill someone to cover up an embarrassing indiscretion it does not mean that the government should step aside and make no efforts to hinder that person’s happiness.  Instead, the Founders meant that it is the right of the people to be able to pursue their goals, dreams and ambitions as long as it does not infringe on the rights of another.  We all have these same rights, regardless of our race, age, gender or financial worth.       

We should never forget that, what is right is always the true for all people, yet we live in a world that no longer understands or cares about these ancient truths.  Our hubris has created a selfish culture.

We must realize that our individual truths of today is self-created. This means that when I am perceived to act on doing what’s right on a solely selfish vision of the truth, I am likely not focused on the real truth. What too many don’t grasp is that the real truth is never selfish because all truths apply equally to each of us.  The Founders understood this greater truth, Power is in a shared consistency.

Anthony “Tony” Boquet, the author of “The Bloodline of Wisdom, The Awakening of a Modern Solutionary”

If this is my last post, I want all to know there was only one purpose for all that I have written; to have made a positive difference in the lives of others.